Long before livestreams and viral eyewall videos, a few observers
deliberately entered hurricane paths to measure and record them.
Their story spans exploration, science, photography, portable
technology—and people such as Jim Leonard, who spent decades
documenting powerful tropical cyclones.
A conceptual field sequence—not aircraft reconnaissance or fixed-site spotting.
What counts as a hurricane chase?
This history principally traces
deliberate, ground-based travel to intercept a tropical
cyclone. The chaser selects a landfall target, travels into the forecast
path, chooses a survivable position and documents the storm at ground
level.
Land-based chase
Self-directed travel toward a forecast landfall, followed by
observation from a sheltered ground position. Film, photographs,
pressure readings and eyewitness logs are typical records.
Aircraft reconnaissance
Mission-assigned crews sample the cyclone over water and aloft,
locate its center, measure winds and pressure, and transmit
operational data to forecasters.
Scientific field project
An institution deploys calibrated instruments and trained teams
under a research plan. Some independent chasers later contributed
observations to these scientific records.
Reporting and witnessing
Trained spotters report local conditions through public-safety
networks; news crews and residents document impacts for other
purposes. The activity becomes chasing when the observer
deliberately travels toward the storm.
Spotting and chasing are not synonyms. A National
Weather Service spotter is a trained observer who reports hazardous
local conditions to a forecast office or public-safety network. A
spotter may remain at home, work from a fixed post or travel locally;
the defining act is the report, not pursuit. A chaser deliberately
changes location to intercept weather. One person can do both, but a
chase does not become an official NWS mission merely because the
chaser submits a useful report.
NHC aircraft reconnaissance is operational fieldwork.
Military and NOAA crews fly assigned patterns over water, locate the
center, measure pressure and winds, and release instrument packages
called dropsondes. Their observations are transmitted for forecasts
and warnings. The flights are planned, crewed and governed as agency
missions; they are not recreational pursuits and they are distinct
from a civilian ground interception.
These six recordings trace the changing visual record of hurricanes:
early motion-picture aftermath, television reporting, regional
archives and independent chasers recording an eye, eyewall and storm
surge at close range.
1900 · motion-picture aftermath
Searching the ruins of Galveston after the disaster
The Edison company dispatched photographers by special train.
This surviving film was made shortly after the cyclone and
records workers searching the wreckage on Broadway. It is not a
chase, but it belongs at the beginning of the visual record of
camera crews entering hurricane disaster zones.
Story of a Hurricane preserves television footage made
around Carla's Texas landfall, including high winds, rising
tides and heavy rain. It documents a professional news
assignment rather than an independent recreational pursuit.
Florida Memory has digitized WFSU-TV's silent color reel from
Panama City. It combines preparations and damage with some
footage made during the hurricane, preserving a regional record
outside the better-known national news archives.
A federal post-storm study called Leonard's videotape
“remarkable.” From a multistory condominium he recorded damaging
wind, rain, the chaotic sea and the eye passage while taking a
digital pressure reading—an unusually valuable visual and
meteorological record from a major hurricane.
Edds' firsthand account describes buying a last-minute ticket,
filming the Category 3 strike and sending video to CNN through a
working dial-up connection. It captures the transitional moment
when a lone field cameraman could transmit from an isolated
landfall before mobile broadband and livestreaming.
Jim Leonard records Hurricane Charley at Port Charlotte
Leonard's creator-channel film preserves his view of Charley's
compact, rapidly intensifying core. The recording belongs to a
wider field record that also supplied handheld pressure
observations to the National Hurricane Center's final report.
Here, hurricane chasing means deliberately traveling on land toward
a tropical cyclone's center or most intense winds. The movement is
usually completed before conditions become impassable; the final
phase is an interception from a selected shelter. This combination
of forecast, travel, positioning and ground-level documentation
distinguishes a chase from simply enduring a storm where one lives.
1926
A newsreel cameraman carried a hurricane into theaters
During the Great Miami Hurricane, Pathé News cameraman Ralph
Radnor Earle worked inside the disaster zone and sent his film to
New York by airplane. A contemporary motion-picture trade report
said the scenes reached Broadway screens on the evening after the
storm. The surviving footage and still photographs are the earliest
presently identified motion-picture field record associated with a
deliberate hurricane assignment.
Earle was a working newsreel cameraman in Miami, not a member of a
later self-directed chase community. His record therefore belongs
to the history of hurricane documentation without supporting the
stronger claim that he invented modern hurricane chasing.
Hurricane reconnaissance developed along a different path. On
September 2, 1935, Cuban Army Air Corps pilot Leonard Povey flew
from Havana to locate the Labor Day hurricane. He found and circled
the storm but did not penetrate it. Four days later, TWA research
pilot Tommy Tomlinson passed through the reintensified cyclone at
high altitude during a meteorological test. On July 27, 1943,
Joseph Duckworth made two well-documented flights through a
hurricane center over Texas. Tasked missions followed, and regular
military reconnaissance began in 1944.
Reconnaissance crews supply center fixes, wind, pressure and storm
structure data to operational forecasters. Independent land chasers
instead document the cyclone where it meets communities, roads and
structures. The two traditions sometimes observe the same storm, but
their routes, instruments and institutional roles are distinct.
Observation was global; mobile pursuit spread later
The self-directed, automobile-based chase culture is most clearly
documented as an American development, aided by a dense road network
and by forecasts that made a landfall target reachable. That does not
make cyclone observation an American invention. The Philippines,
India and Hong Kong built fixed observing and warning systems in the
nineteenth century, decades before mobile storm chasing acquired a
name. Independent pursuit later appeared in other cyclone basins.
1865–1917 · Asian warning networks
Manila's observatory, India's cyclone-warning service and the
Hong Kong Observatory developed instruments, storm signals and
public warnings. These were stationary scientific services,
not chase expeditions.
1999 onward · Pacific photojournalism
New Zealand photographer Geoff Mackley deliberately pursued
Pacific cyclones by air and road. A 2001 profile records six
such intercepts since 1999, including a Category 5 cyclone in
Western Australia. His work is a documented non-U.S. example
of independent tropical-cyclone pursuit.
2002–today · Asian aircraft science
Taiwan's DOTSTAR “typhoon chasing” program represents a third
tradition: planned aircraft observations using dropsondes
rather than an independent ground chase. National Taiwan
University established its Typhoon Research Center in 2009 to
connect those targeted observations with modeling, ocean
interaction, rainfall research and the training of new typhoon
scientists.
From specialized observation to independent pursuit
Hurricane research aircraft, emerging satellite imagery and an
increasingly sophisticated warning system transformed how hurricanes
could be located. Meanwhile, weather enthusiasts began deliberately
traveling to intercept landfalling storms on the ground. Their
equipment was usually modest: paper maps, radio, barometers, still
or motion-picture cameras and forecasts obtained through official
sources.
Richard Horodner records a deliberate interception of Hurricane
Inez in South Florida in 1966 in his own career chronology. He went
on to film landfalling hurricanes for decades. A 2000 ABC News
profile describes the forecast study, travel, positioning and
camera work that made up an independent ground chase before mobile
radar and smartphones.
Broadcast reporting supplied a parallel form of deliberate field
documentation. During Hurricane Carla in September 1961, KHOU-TV
reporter Dan Rather broadcast from Galveston as the storm approached
the Texas coast. Boston University's Dan Rather Papers preserve
audiovisual and documentary material from that assignment. Rather
was reporting rather than pursuing storms as an independent hobby,
but the Carla record established an early model for the live,
on-location hurricane coverage that later became a recognizable
branch of field interception.
A community-researched early-chase chronology identifies another
bridge to that record: Florida State University student Terry Nixon
joined an independent Hurricane Betsy chase in 1965, then chased
Hurricane Inez with Horodner in 1966. Later entries and firsthand
recollections place Nixon at Hurricane Kate in 1985, Hurricane Hugo
in Puerto Rico in 1989 and Hurricane Andrew in 1992. Because this
chronology combines participant recollection with later research,
the archive presents it as a documented lead rather than a settled
claim that Nixon was the first amateur hurricane chaser.
Three hurricanes reached Jim before Jim chased hurricanes
In his original biography, Jim described becoming fascinated by
severe thunderstorms while growing up around Miami. He recalled Hurricane
Donna's passage in 1960 as the defining weather experience of his
youth. He wrote that he began tracking every tropical cyclone in the
Atlantic basin after Donna. He then named Hurricanes Cleo (1964) and
Betsy (1965), which affected the Miami region more directly, as
further experiences that deepened his fascination.
Those Miami encounters formed Jim's weather education: tracking
storms on paper, watching forecasts evolve and learning the changing
character of wind and pressure as a cyclone approached. His overland
interception record emerged in the following decade.
From lifelong fascination to intentional interception
Jim's documented field record begins with Hurricane Agnes in June
1972. His recovered storm log places him at Panama City for the June
19 landfall, while his own video channel preserves film of an
Agnes-spawned tornado in the Florida Everglades on June 18. The two
records show the forecasting, travel and filming that marked the
start of his sustained hurricane-interception career.
By the late 1970s Jim was creating a distinctive visual record. A
later historical compilation identifies his Hurricane David eyewall
footage from Florida in 1979 and attributes a Hurricane Frederic
chase in Alabama to Leonard and Richard Horodner.
Jim also chased tornadoes in the Great Plains and pursued western
Pacific typhoons, later spending substantial time on Guam. His
archive therefore connects Atlantic hurricane interception, western
Pacific typhoon work and the wider American storm-chasing community.
As consumer video became more practical, independent storm chasers
could return with a moving visual record of eyewall passage, wind
damage, waves and changing cloud structures. Jim documented
Hurricane Allen in 1980, Gilbert in Mexico in 1988, and Hugo in
1989. A later historical video chronology also attributes a shared
Hurricane Diana chase in 1984 to Jim and Richard Horodner. NOAA
published multiple Gilbert photographs credited directly to Leonard,
while federal research incorporated observations from his encounters
with Hugo.
The early community remained small, but a 2015 interview with former
National Hurricane Center director Dr. Neil Frank now provides
direct evidence of its information-sharing practice. Frank recalls
Leonard and other chasers returning to the center, gathering in a
conference room, comparing notes and playing field audio recordings.
He also remembers worrying about their safety. The recollection
captures an informal exchange between independent observers and
hurricane specialists before online video made those encounters
instantly public.
Television field reporting became a distinct branch of hurricane
chasing during the same decade. In 1985, Weather Channel producer
Glenn “Hurricane” Schwartz and photographer Steve Angel followed
Hurricane Elena for nearly a week while gathering footage for a
National Science Foundation-funded documentary. Schwartz's
firsthand account records almost 3,000 miles of repositioning, a
telephone report from Mobile and sheltering from the eyewall in
Pascagoula. In 1988, Liz Jarvis Fabian—then the network's principal
field storm reporter—followed Hurricane Gilbert to the Texas coast
and participated in The Weather Channel's first live coastal storm
report. These assignments mark the transition from footage gathered
mainly for later exhibition to reporting delivered from the storm
zone itself.
Hurricane Andrew in 1992 and successive Atlantic hurricane landfalls
brought intense public attention to hurricane imagery. More portable
camcorders, broadcast television and early online networks amplified
work that had previously circulated among enthusiasts or appeared in
documentary films. Chasers' records revealed localized conditions at
human scale, while calibrated instruments, radar and aircraft
supplied the measurement framework used in official analysis.
Together, field imagery and formal observing networks created a more
complete account: what the cyclone measured like, what it looked and
sounded like, and how it interacted with particular buildings,
coastlines and communities.
Nick Ravo's March 1992 New York Times profile offers a contemporary
snapshot just before Andrew. It presents storm chasing as a small
but growing pursuit, connects its expansion to portable video
cameras and television demand, and records both safety and disaster
etiquette concerns. Jim is the article's opening subject; the
profile also documents his 1991 move to Guam.
Mobile internet, GPS, better forecasts and digital cameras made
storm interception easier to plan and faster to publish. The
catastrophic 2004 and 2005 seasons also drew far more attention to
the activity. During Charley's 2004 Florida landfall, Jim recorded a
barometric observation of 950.0 mb at Port Charlotte, which the NHC
preserved in its official report. This is the clearest example of
where the independent chaser's observations entered the historical
operational record.
The same technologies also expanded the audience and the number of
people seeking to witness hurricanes directly, intensifying concerns
about storm surge, debris, emergency access and the visibility of
hazardous conduct.
A history carried by observers, organizers and mentors
Hurricane chasing grew through parallel contributions: early road
interceptions, films and measurements, newsletters and gatherings,
operational relationships, and later digital records that could enter
scientific analysis.
Ralph Radnor Earle
Earle's 1926 Pathé News assignment preserved the Great Miami
Hurricane in motion pictures and moved the film rapidly into
national newsreel circulation. His work is an early documentary
milestone, distinct from later independent chasing.
Leonard Povey, Tommy Tomlinson and Joseph Duckworth
Povey's locating flight, Tomlinson's 1935 research penetration and
Duckworth's 1943 center crossings belong to the separate history
of hurricane aviation. Later evidence makes “first flight” a set
of distinct claims rather than one settled title.
The documented early chronology places Nixon on a 1965 Hurricane
Betsy chase and both men at Hurricane Inez in 1966. Horodner's
firsthand record then traces a career joining field filming,
public education and hurricane-video production across five
decades.
Beginning in the early 1970s, Jim built a multi-decade archive of
hurricanes, typhoons and tornadoes. Official publications preserve
his photographs, video and portable pressure observations.
Hoadley's Storm Track newsletter helped turn scattered
severe-weather observers into a community. Its 1983 record of Jim
Leonard and Barbara White screening film in Norman shows how chase
knowledge circulated before the web.
The NHC meteorologists represent the human bridge between
forecasting and the early chaser network: informal post-storm
gatherings, shared films and a mutual interest in weather imagery.
By Hurricane Charley in 2004, a new generation carried portable
digital instruments and cameras into landfall. The NHC observer
table places their readings beside Jim Leonard's Port Charlotte
measurement.
Global cyclone chasing entered another phase when detailed ground
observations could contribute directly to peer-reviewed analysis.
Morgerman's Hurricane Patricia record supported a 2017 scientific
synthesis of the storm's extraordinary intensification.
The New Zealand photojournalist's late-1990s cyclone work is an
early, well-documented example of sustained tropical-cyclone
pursuit outside the American chase community.
Who chased hurricanes—and who chased with Jim? Search
the sourced directory of historical and current hurricane chasers, or
open the narrower companion record connecting people to particular
storms with Jim.
Search the directory → ·
Explore Jim's companion accounts →
1998–today
Universities turn interception into field research
Academic teams formalized parts of the practice that independent chasers had developed informally: forecast a landfall, move before roads close, select safe instrument sites and preserve measurements for later analysis. The Florida Coastal Monitoring Program began in 1998, and Texas Tech's StickNet grew from a 2005 student design project into a network used in hurricanes and severe storms.
Other institutions teach storm observation through supervised Great Plains or Gulf Coast courses, connect students to NOAA aviation, or train typhoon researchers through programs such as National Taiwan University’s DOTSTAR. Those pathways share skills with hurricane chasing but are not interchangeable, so the archive catalogs hurricane-specific research separately from tornado-focused classes and clubs.
The living-room archives: Jim’s hurricane-chaser gatherings
Hurricane chasing had informal classrooms: shared vehicles,
screenings of storm tapes, private gatherings, and extended
conversations. Jim Leonard's homes became important venues, but the
practice was already visible in the wider storm-chasing community.
At gatherings held intermittently in South Florida—documented in the
Florida Keys and later in Boynton Beach—chasers screened their storm
videos, shared stories, compared equipment, and spent time together
over food. These were social occasions, but also an important means
by which field experience was circulated across generations before
videos could readily be shared online.
A contemporary July 1983 issue of Storm Track places Jim
Leonard and Barbara White at a Norman chaser barbecue screening
supercell video, demonstrating the social transmission of field
experience long before the later South Florida gatherings. Chris
Collura photographed the March 28, 2009 gathering in the Florida
Keys, including visitors watching chase videos and discussing
equipment. HurricaneCity's archive identifies a 13-minute film of
the March 20, 2010 gathering. Chris Kridler's contemporary April
2012 account describes Jim hosting chasers in Boynton Beach on March
31, 2012. Collura also documented gatherings in March 2013 and early
March 2014, identifying the latter as Jim’s final gathering.
Together, the films, photographs and contemporary accounts show a
repeated culture of learning through screenings, equipment talk and
shared experience. Visitors with firsthand memories or original
photographs may add to this record through the archive.
Live images and the problem of preserving the past
Livestreaming, mobile radar, drones and instantaneous publishing
have made hurricane chasing a highly visible part of modern weather
coverage. Professional news crews, scientists, independent observers
and online creators now operate with very different objectives—and
different standards of risk and evidence.
Jim died in 2014. Some of his original web material subsequently
disappeared from its longtime address. Its recovery highlights a
neglected part of storm science history: video tapes, images, storm
logs and personal websites are themselves historical data, yet they
may be less durable than formal government reports. CycloneJim.org
preserves both the individual legacy and the broader evolution of
the practice.
Historical interview • December 3, 1986
Hear Jim in his own words
A WTXL-TV interview recorded in 1986 was shared on YouTube by
filmmaker Blake Naftel, who identifies Randy Zipser as the source of
the copy. Jim discusses his early chases and his approach to storm
documentation.
Dr. Neil Frank remembers the conference-room gatherings
The interviewer begins asking about Jim Leonard at 10:14; Jim's name
is spoken at approximately 10:15.8. Frank recalls chasers returning to
the National Hurricane Center to compare notes and play audio captured
in storms. The embed starts with the lead-in to that exchange.
Jim belonged to the small first generation of sustained independent
hurricane chasers. His distinctive contribution was breadth: decades
of Atlantic hurricanes, western Pacific typhoons and Great Plains
storms recorded through film, photography and portable measurements.
NOAA and NHC publications preserve parts of that field record, while
the people he mentored carried his positioning and documentation
practices into the digital era. In a firsthand Hurricane Michael
account, Doug Kiesling records that advice Jim gave him in 2002—move
farther inland into the eye and wait for the surge to recede—guided
his decisions during the 2018 storm.